February 2015 lecture series

Climate Action Now: Learning by Lecture

6:00-7:00 PM, room 202, Senior Center, Iowa City. (One exception, the Mar. 23 lecture will begin at 6:30)

================================

Monday, Feb.9- Connie Mutel

Monday, Feb. 23- Miriam Kashia

Monday, March 2- Ferman Milster

Monday, March 9- Cindy Spading  RDN  LD (materials: 1 2 3 4)

Monday, March 23- Jerald Schnoor

2. Feb. 9- “Writing Climate Change”, Connie Mutel, historian and archivist for Hydroscience and Engineering at the University of Iowa. Mutel has written several books on Iowa’s natural environment. She will speak on her current project- a climate change memoir.

3. Feb. 23- “My March for Climate Action”, Miriam Kashia- social justice leader, Peace Corp worker, and Mayor of The Great March for Climate Action. Miriam will reflect on the demanding experience of marching seven million steps (about 2000 miles) at the age of 71 and on being Mayor of The Great March for Climate Action. What does she see as the next step in climate action for all of us?

4. March 2- “The University of Iowa’s Biomass Fuel Project”,  Ferman Milster, registered professional engineer in the University of Iowa’s Office of Sustainability. Ferman Milster will talk about his responsibility for developing solid fuel renewable energy sources to replace fossil fuel in the University’s combined heat and power plants.

5. March 9“The Impact of Food on the Environment”,  Cindy Spading, RDN, LD, a registered dietitian nutritionist with a special interest in plant-based nutrition. Spading will discuss how eating less meat and dairy is good for both the planet and human health. The emphasis will be on how to incorporate more plant-based foods into your diet.

1. March 23 – “Sustainable Systems”, Jerald Schnoor, Ph. D., P.E., B.C.E.E., Allen S. Henry Chair in Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Iowa. A renown leader in his field, Dr. Schnoor will discuss how sustainable systems can reverse dangerous climate change and whether the U.S. will be a leader at the 2015 Paris Global Climate Meeting.

Posted in Education | Tagged | Comments Off on February 2015 lecture series

Pat Bowen on Bakken January 26, 2015

We can’t risk Bakken pipeline in Iowa

The Iowa Utilities Board has been formally asked to approve the application submitted by Dakota Access LLC, a subsidiary of Energy Transfer Partners for its plans for a crude oil pipeline that would slice diagonally across Iowa counties, affecting 18 counties.

One of the selling points is Dakota Access/ETP has said the project would have an Iowa economic impact of $1.1 billion during two years of construction, creating enough work to keep 7,600 workers employed for a year. I have also heard the number 2,000 for six months. However, I have not heard where these workers will come from. Will they be Iowans? Or will the workers be moved in from some other state because Iowans will not have the expertise or skills to perform the work required? Has this question been asked and answered yet?

I am opposed to the pipeline project on many levels, the most important one being the impact on our environment, which includes our agricultural land as well as the water and air. Can we afford the risk to Iowa and its citizens for some temporary jobs that may not even go to Iowans? The risk we will take on will be long term, expensive and harmful to our health when the spill occurs. With spills happening quite frequently, what is the guarantee Iowa will not see a spill? There is none.

Write the IUB, 1375 E. Court Ave., Room 69, Des Moines, IA 50319-0069; use Docket No HLP-2014-0001 and your state legislature and say “No” to the Bakken Pipeline.

Pat Bowen

Iowa City

Posted in Archive, Publicity | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Pat Bowen on Bakken January 26, 2015

The Gazette 01/26/2015

ENVIRONMENT

Food fight enters climate debate

Nutrition become new arena for global warming debate

Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON – The political clash over climate change has entered new

territory that does not involve a massive oil pipeline or a subsidy for

renewable energy, but a quaint federal chart that tries to nudge Americans

toward a healthy diet.

The food pyramid, that 30-year-old backbone of grade-school nutrition

lessons, has become a test case of how far the Obama administration is

willing to push in pursuit of its global warming agenda.

The unexpected debate began with a suggestion by a prominent panel of

government scientists: The food pyramid – recently refashioned in the shape

of a dinner plate – could be reworked to consider the heavy carbon impact of

raising animals for meat, they said. A growing body of research has found

that meat animals, and cows, in particular, with their belching of greenhouse

gases, trampling of the landscape and need for massive amounts of water, are

a major factor in global warming.

Cattle industry representatives quickly raised the alarm, summoning help

from Republicans in Congress and their allies. ‘There is an anti-meat agenda

out there, and this is a way to go after meat,’ said Daren Bakst, a fellow at the

Heritage Foundation, the conservative research and advocacy organization.

‘We need to just focus on nutrition. Once you bring up these other things, it

undermines the legitimacy of the guidelines.’ Administration officials are

enmeshed in bitter fights with Republicans over coal-fired power plants,

methane emissions from oil and gas production and regulation of

Whether they have the stomach for adding a food fight to the list remains

uncertain. But the possibility that climate change politics could affect

nutrition guidelines serves as a reminder of how many parts of daily life the

struggle to limit global warming can reach.

‘We can’t solve the climate problem with just what we are doing with fossil

fuels and energy,’ said Doug Boucher, director of climate research at the

Union of Concerned Scientists, which is lobbying for changing the pyramid.

‘Food is a big part of it.’ The food pyramid is just the latest function of

government where climate change looms large after years of not being a

consideration. Legions of military officers are focused on shifting the nation’s

fighting force to clean energy, hoping ultimately to not only limit global

warming, but also save money and reduce the need for huge, vulnerable oil

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is pushing a green

Even the Department of Education is required to regularly produce a climate

change action plan.

But the stakes are high when it comes to steak. The dietary guidelines

embodied in the pyramid are the core of the nation’s food policy.

Although the nation’s obesity epidemic raises questions about whether food

guidelines influence public behavior, they do shape billions of dollars of

government programs, including school lunches and food stamps.

Environmental and animal rights groups see the discussion of the role food

plays in climate change as an opportunity to reach a vast new group of

‘People care a lot more about their own personal health than they do about the

environment or animal welfare,’ said Michael Jacobson, executive director at

the Center for Science in the Public Interest in Washington.

‘So these groups are hoping to make progress on their issues by linking them

to healthier diets.’ Despite a major push by the United Nations for countries

to rework dietary policies with an eye on climate impact, none has. The

Netherlands is expected to be the first when it releases a new chart illustrating

food guidelines this year, said Kate Clancy, a longtime sustainability

advocate who advised the federal panel. ‘This is a way to get people to think

about how their food is produced,’ Clancy said. ‘We should not be making it

seem like there is no connection between what you eat and its impact on the planet.’

Research has shown that raising animals, cows in particular, for meat is a

major factor in global warming because the animals produce high greenhouse

gas emissions and require massive amounts of water.

Los Angeles Times

Posted in Publicity | Tagged | Comments Off on The Gazette 01/26/2015

Resources to encourage vegetarian eating

Are cows the cause of global warming?

http://timeforchange.org/are-cows-cause-of-global-warming-meat-methane-CO2 – – – – web page gone.
and I found one more
Are we Comfortably Unaware?
 

Articles

Good article on “Cowspiracy”:
https://animalblawg.wordpress.com/2015/10/12/are-we-comfortably-unaware/

http://www.chooseveg.com/ is an excellent source for vegetarian eating

Books

The Plantpower Way: Whole Food Plant-Based Recipes and Guidance for The Whole Family – April 28, 2015 by Rich Roll (Author), Julie Piatt (Author) #1 Best Seller in Vegetarian Cooking

Frances-Moore-Lappe published Diet for a Small Planet in1971 and has continued to write books ever since about saving the planet from animal agriculture. Almost 50 years later we still struggle.

What the Fork Are You Eating?: An Action Plan for Your Pantry and Plate by Stefanie Sacks

Comfortably Unaware by Richard Oppenlander

Book: Food Choice and Sustainability: Why Buying Local, Eating Less Meat and taking baby steps won’t work  by Richard Oppenlander  available through Amazon
Diet for a Hot Planet: The Climate Crisis at the End of Your Fork and What you can do About It  by Anna Lappe
The Food Revolution: How Diet can Save Your Life and The World by John Robbins
Ethics of eating meat etc:
Why we Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows by Melanie Joy
Book  Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer available through Amazon
Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals and the Call to Mercy by Matthew Scully
Vegan Myth Vegan Truth
http://www.amazon.com/Vegan-Myth-Truth-Obliterating-Earth-saving/dp/1884702023/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1422235256&sr=1-1-catcorr&keywords=vegucated+documentary#customerReviews
Lynn’s handout at May, 2015, meeting:

Animal agriculture is a leading cause of species extinction, water pollution, destruction of the rainforest  and the creation of ocean dead zones. Animal agriculture creates more greenhouse gases than all of transportation combined. And you can choose to limit your consumption of meat, dairy and eggs every  day,  three times a day.Some plant based eating ideasBreakfast:½ cup organic steel cut oats,  1 ½ cups waterFruit ( blueberries, strawberries, bananas  or peaches etc), ground flaxseedCan add some cinnamon and/or molasses

A little soy or almond or rice milk.

After water is boiling, add oatmeal and simmer 13 to 15 minutes ( you don’t have to stir it –just set a timer)  Then add the other ingredients.  Delicious and nutritious and a great start to your day.

You can use rolled oats if you want it to cook faster ( I think this ratio is 1:1 water to oats)

Lunch or dinner easy/ fast  meal:

 1)Tortilla with humus and whatever vegetables you like2)  Baked potato topped with chard or kale and guacamole, or salsa and guacamole. Can top with black beans, pinto or garbanzo beans.  Can also use crumbled tempeh.3) Big salad with any of these:  avocado, olives, pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds, nutritional yeast, celery, carrots, tomatoes, peppers, beans, tempeh4)Beanburgers: it is nice to have some in the freezer for a quick sandwich.( I like to buy them from Dave Burt)
Posted in Diet & Climate | Tagged | Comments Off on Resources to encourage vegetarian eating

Press-Citizen page 1 – January 19, 2015

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/news/local/2015/01/18/grannies-climate-change/21977119/

Climate group aims to make difference through education

Posted in Education, Publicity | Tagged , | Comments Off on Press-Citizen page 1 – January 19, 2015

Pat Bowen’s letter 1/12/2015 to the Press-Citizen

Real culprit is farming in non-sustainable way

Posted in Archive, Publicity | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Pat Bowen’s letter 1/12/2015 to the Press-Citizen

Lynn Gallager LTE Press-Citizen 12/4/14

Gov. Terry Branstad misleading public about crates

Gov. Terry Branstad says: “I can’t think of anything more humane than protecting baby pigs from being crushed to death by big sows. That’s why I can’t understand why a group that calls itself the Humane Society would be against saving baby pigs.”

Gestation crates are used when sows are pregnant. There are no baby pigs involved. There is no reason to confine these intelligent, sentient beings in these tiny crates while they are pregnant. They cannot even turn around. But all the industrial hog operations care about is profit.

It is so disingenuous for Branstad to pretend he cares about the welfare of the pigs.

Chris Petersen is an independent family farmer who wrote a guest opinion recently. He believes gestation crates should be banned. He said: “You don’t need to be a pig psychiatrist to see that the animals go insane in these crates.”

Please don’t support these cruel practices. Just stop buying their products.

Lynn Gallagher

Solon

Posted in Archive, Publicity | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Lynn Gallager LTE Press-Citizen 12/4/14

Becky Ross op ed 11/22/14

Let’s be a leader on reusable bags

Three years ago I seldom thought about single-use plastic bags. I used to only think about them when I had a pile of them so big I knew it was time to recycle. I also thought recycling was the perfect solution. That was before I really knew anything about plastic.

We use plastic bags an average of 12 minutes before throwing them away or recycling them. Single-use plastic bags don’t get recycled into new bags. They are down-cycled into carpet, decking or park benches, etc. So, it always takes new plastic to make more bags.

Only 5 percent of all single-use plastic bags actually get recycled. What happens to the other 95 percent? They end up floating around in our landscape and waterways. They do not biodegrade. They photo-degrade, which means they break down into smaller and smaller pieces. While this is happening they leach harmful chemicals into the land or water. They blow away from the landfills because they are so lightweight. Animals often eat this plastic and it usually means a painful death, as it will not digest.

Even the oceans are being affected. Every ocean now has a plastic gyre — a swirling mass of plastic — floating just below the surface. Because sea life ingests it, it ends up in our food chain. Those chemicals I mentioned earlier are showing up in humans.

Plastic bags also cost the public money because they get caught in drain systems and machinery, which have to be cleaned out. It’s a waste of time and energy.

Paper is not the answer. We need to grow more trees, not cut them down to make paper.

The best solution is to use a cloth reusable bag. Reusable bags can be used 700 plus times. They are very washable. I throw the dirty bags in with my weekly laundry.

Last week, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the nation’s first statewide ban on single-use plastic bags at grocery and convenience stores, driven to action by pollution in streets and waterways. Plastic bags will be phased out of checkout counters at large grocery stores and supermarkets such as Walmart and Target starting next summer, and convenience stores and pharmacies in 2016. It allows grocers to charge a fee of at least 10 cents for using paper bags.

State Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Los Angeles, credits the momentum for statewide legislation to the more than 100 cities and counties, including Los Angeles and San Francisco, that already have such bans.

The law marks a major milestone for environmental activists who have successfully pushed plastic bag bans in cities across the U.S., including Chicago, Austin, and Seattle. Hawaii is on track to have a defacto statewide ban, with all counties approving prohibitions.

“This bill is a step in the right direction — it reduces the torrent of plastic polluting our beaches, parks and even the vast ocean itself,” Brown said in a signing statement. “We’re the first to ban these bags, and we won’t be the last.”

Changing to reusable bags is a simple matter of changing our habits, which will be good for the future of our planet. Getting people to understand “why” is the problem.

100Grannies.com For a Livable Future has partnered with the Iowa City Recycling Center for a “Bring Your Own Bag” promotion. We are asking retail stores to reduce their use of plastic bags and giving our seal of approval to those who do.

When we start thinking about the health of our planet, eliminating plastic bags from our environment is a crucial step. Let’s be a leader in Iowa and start the ball rolling here.

Becky Ross is a member of 100 Grannies For a Livable Future.

Posted in Archive, Bag Committee, Publicity | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Becky Ross op ed 11/22/14

Barbara Schlachter’s op ed November 20, 2014

Time to put revenue neutral fee on carbon

In the bleak mid-winter, which seems to have hit Iowa rather early on a number of fronts, I have been looking for signs of good news.

One of these is the agreement between the U.S. and China on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

China has never before agreed to stop growing their emissions but now has pledged to reach their peak emissions by 2030, with wind and solar to constitute 20 percent of that total. China and the U.S. are the largest greenhouse gas emitters, comprising 40 percent of the world’s total.

This agreement is not insignificant on its own but it is even more important as an encouragement to other nations to realize that the time for idle talk and empty pledges has come to an end. Action must be taken by all if we are to keep the temperature of the earth from rising 2 degrees over what it was before the industrial revolution.

I have come to understand that people will not admit to a problem if they do not like the solution. The human psyche is very good at denial and compartmentalization. For those who imagine cutting carbon emissions means living in the cold and dark, without a job, they need to think again. It is no longer the old either/or — jobs and the economy or combating global warming. This is very good news indeed. Here is how it can be accomplished.

By putting a revenue neutral fee on carbon at its source of extraction that would start at $10 a ton per annum and increase by $10 per year, emissions would come down by 50 percent after 20 years and put the country on track to achieve the 80 percent reduction needed by mid-century to avoid catastrophic climate change.

There are two important things to note here: one is that all money would be returned to the American people as an equal across-the-board payment for each person and that border adjustments would be made so American businesses would be protected. As carbon becomes more expensive, and solar and wind and other non-carbon sources of energy become less expensive, there would be less reliance on coal, gas and oil.

Meanwhile, economically, here are some facts from a report issued by Regional Economic Models Inc. They predict that 2.8 million jobs would be added over 20 years. People are going to have more money in their pocket with the revenue returned to them. The GDP would increase $70 billion to $85 billion from 2020 on. The monthly dividend for a family of four with two adults in 2025 would be $288.

After 10 years, our air would be cleaner and our health better, with 13,000 lives saved annually. What’s not to like? Jobs and a healthier environment, with a chance to significantly reduce the carbon emissions that are damaging our atmosphere and currently setting us on a path for severe weather — more drought, more floods, more fires, higher sea levels, greater loss of species diversification. It is important to remember that action needs to be taken before the climate effects are irreversible. We don’t have long.

The good news with a Republican Congress is that they can embrace this free-market approach that grows our economy and imposes no new taxes. The carbon fee and dividend plan is supported by some leading conservatives, including former Secretary of State George Shultz. Under President Obama, wind production has tripled and solar production has increased by ten-fold. Let’s be able to credit the Republicans for taking us the rest of the way.

Meanwhile, we are getting ready to celebrate the American holiday of Thanksgiving. It is one that regardless of religious or political persuasion we can celebrate together, and we do it by sitting down at a table and sharing food with family and/or friends.

China may not have an American Thanksgiving, but she shares our common ground. Our common ground is our common ground. It is our earth and it’s the only one we will ever have.

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!

The Rev. Dr. Barbara Schlachter is a retired Episcopal priest who is a member of the Iowa City Climate Advocates, the Citizens Climate Lobby and 100 Grannies for a Livable Future.

IOW barbara schlachter.jpg

Posted in Archive | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Barbara Schlachter’s op ed November 20, 2014

Naomi Klein’s ‘This Changes Everything’

NY Times Sunday Book Review

Photo

Naomi Klein Credit Suzanne DeChillo/The New York Times
Continue reading the main story Share This Page

“Every inhabitant of this planet must contemplate the day when this planet may no longer be habitable.” Thus spoke President Kennedy in a 1961 address to the United Nations. The threat he warned of was not climate chaos — barely a blip on anybody’s radar at the time — but the hydrogen bomb. The nuclear threat had a volatile urgency and visual clarity that the sprawling, hydra-headed menace of today’s climate calamity cannot match. How can we rouse citizens and governments to act for concerted change? Will it take, as Naomi Klein insists, nothing less than a Marshall Plan for Earth?

“This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate” is a book of such ambition and consequence that it is almost unreviewable. Klein’s fans will recognize her method from her prior books, “No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies” (1999) and “The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism” (2007), which, with her latest, form an antiglobalization trilogy. Her strategy is to take a scourge — brand-­driven hyperconsumption, corporate exploitation of disaster-struck communities, or “the fiction of perpetual growth on a finite planet” — trace its origins, then chart a course of liberation. In each book she arrives at some semihopeful place, where activists are reaffirming embattled civic values.

To call “This Changes Everything” environmental is to limit Klein’s considerable agenda. “There is still time to avoid catastrophic warming,” she contends, “but not within the rules of capitalism as they are currently constructed. Which is surely the best argument there has ever been for changing those rules.” On the green left, many share Klein’s sentiments. George Monbiot, a columnist for The Guardian, recently lamented that even though “the claims of market fundamentalism have been disproven as dramatically as those of state communism, somehow this zombie ideology staggers on.” Klein, Monbiot and Bill McKibben all insist that we cannot avert the ecological disaster that confronts us without loosening the grip of that superannuated zombie ideology.

That philosophy — ­neoliberalism — promotes a high-consumption, ­carbon-hungry system. Neoliberalism has encouraged mega-mergers, trade agreements hostile to environmental and labor regulations, and global hypermobility, enabling a corporation like Exxon to make, as McKibben has noted, “more money last year than any company in the history of money.” Their outsize power mangles the democratic process. Yet the carbon giants continue to reap $600 billion in annual subsidies from public coffers, not to speak of a greater subsidy: the right, in Klein’s words, to treat the atmosphere as a “waste dump.”

So much for the invisible hand. As the science fiction writer Kim Stanley Robinson observed, when it comes to the environment, the invisible hand never picks up the check.

Klein diagnoses impressively what hasn’t worked. No more claptrap about fracked gas as a bridge to renewables. Enough already of the international summit meetings that produce sirocco-quality hot air, and nonbinding agreements that bind us all to more emissions. Klein dismantles the boondoggle that is cap and trade. She skewers grandiose command-and-control schemes to re-engineer the planet’s climate. No point, when a hubristic mind-set has gotten us into this mess, to pile on further hubris. She reserves a special scorn for the partnerships between Big Green organizations and Immense Carbon, peddled as win-win for everyone, but which haven’t slowed emissions. Such partnerships remind us that when the lamb and the lion lie down together, only one of them gets eaten.

In democracies driven by lobbyists, donors and plutocrats, the giant polluters are going to win while the rest of us, in various degrees of passivity and complicity, will watch the planet die. “Any attempt to rise to the climate challenge will be fruitless unless it is understood as part of a much broader battle of worldviews,” Klein writes. “Our economic system and our planetary system are now at war.”

Klein reminds us that neoliberalism was once an upstart counterrevolution. Through an epic case of bad timing, the Reagan-Thatcher revolution, the rise of the anti-regulatory World Trade Organization, and the cult of privatizing and globalizing everything coincided with the rising public authority of climate science. In 1988, James Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute, delivered historic testimony at Congressional hearings, declaring that the science was 99 percent unequivocal: The world was warming and we needed to act collectively to reduce emissions. Just one year earlier, Margaret Thatcher famously declared: “There is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women and there are families.” In the battle since, between a collective strategy for forging an inhabitable long-term future and the antisocial, hyper-­corporatized, hyper-carbonized pursuit of short-term growth at any cost, well, there has been only one clear winner.

But counterrevolutions are reversible. Klein devotes much of her book to propitious signs that this can happen — indeed is happening. The global climate justice movement is spreading. Since the mid-1990s, environmental protests have been growing in China at 29 percent per year. Where national leaders have faltered, local governments are forging ahead. Hundreds of German cities and towns have voted to buy back their energy grids from corporations. About two-thirds of Britons favor renationalizing energy and rail.

The divestment movement against Big Carbon is gathering force. While it will never bankrupt the mega-corporations, it can reveal unethical practices while triggering a debate about values that recognizes that such practices are nested in economic systems that encourage, inhibit or even prohibit them.

The voices Klein gathers from across the world achieve a choral force. We hear a Montana goat rancher describe how an improbable alliance against Big Coal between local Native American tribes and settler descendants awakened in the latter a different worldview of time and change and possibility. We hear participants in Idle No More, the First Nations movement that has swept across Canada and beyond, contrast the “extractivist mind-set” with systems “designed to promote more life.”

One quibble: What’s with the subtitle? “Capitalism vs. the Climate” sounds like a P.R. person’s idea of a marquee cage fight, but it belies the sophistication and hopefulness of Klein’s argument. As is sometimes said, it is easier to imagine the end of the world than to imagine the end of capitalism. Klein’s adversary is neoliberalism — the extreme capitalism that has birthed our era of extreme extraction. Klein is smart and pragmatic enough to shun the never-never land of capitalism’s global overthrow. What she does, brilliantly, is provide a historically refined exposé of “capitalism’s drift toward monopoly,” of “corporate interests intent on capturing and radically shrinking the public sphere,” and of “the disaster capitalists who use crises to end-run around democracy.”

To change economic norms and ethical perceptions in tandem is even more formidable than the technological battle to adapt to the heavy weather coming down the tubes. Yet “This Changes Everything” is, improbably, Klein’s most optimistic book. She braids together the science, psychology, geopolitics, economics, ethics and activism that shape the climate question. The result is the most momentous and contentious environmental book since “Silent Spring.”

Posted in Archive, Publicity | Tagged , | Comments Off on Naomi Klein’s ‘This Changes Everything’